Process of Knowing: Activity, Discovery, and Dialogue – Views of David Ausubel PE 5 Odisha B.Ed & Education Honours

Process of Knowing: Activity, Discovery, and Dialogue – Views of David Ausubel

Introduction

The process of knowing refers to how individuals acquire, understand, and internalize knowledge. Educational psychologists and philosophers like David Ausubel have contributed significantly to our understanding of how learning takes place in the human mind.

David Ausubel, an American psychologist, is best known for his theory of Meaningful Verbal Learning and Subsumption Theory. His ideas stand somewhat in contrast to discovery learning approaches advocated by others like Bruner or Piaget. However, Ausubel offered a cognitive and structured approach to how learners organize and retain knowledge meaningfully, emphasizing the importance of prior knowledge.

In this answer, we’ll explore Ausubel’s perspective on the process of knowing, focusing on how he viewed activity, discovery, and dialogue within his framework.

1. David Ausubel’s Educational Philosophy

Ausubel’s key concern was with how people learn large bodies of meaningful information. He proposed that “The most important single factor influencing learning is what the learner already knows. Ascertain this and teach him accordingly.”

This insight forms the foundation of his learning theory, which includes:

Meaningful learning vs. rote learning

Subsumption theory

Advance organizers

The role of prior knowledge

His theory emphasizes receptive learning (teacher provides structured information) over discovery learning, but not as passive—it is active in the mind, where new knowledge is meaningfully anchored to existing cognitive structures.

2. Meaningful Learning: The Core of Knowing

Definition

Meaningful learning occurs when new information is related to prior knowledge in a way that makes sense to the learner. This involves mental activity, organization, and integration of ideas.

Unlike rote learning (memorization without understanding), meaningful learning:

Leads to deeper comprehension

Promotes long-term retention

Facilitates transfer of knowledge

Ausubel argued that knowledge is best acquired through organized verbal learning, not through unstructured discovery.

3. Activity in Learning: Cognitive Activity over Physical

A. Ausubel’s View of Activity

Ausubel did not promote activity-based learning in the physical sense (like experiments or manipulatives) as much as others like Dewey or Bruner. Instead, he believed that:

Mental or cognitive activity is more critical than physical activity.

True activity happens in the mind when a learner organizes and relates new information to existing concepts.

B. Internal Activity

Learners are not passive recipients.

They actively engage mentally with the material.

They try to assimilate new knowledge into their cognitive structure.

C. Receptive vs. Discovery Learning

Mode	Definition	Ausubel's View
Receptive Learning	Learner receives the content in final form	Most efficient for meaningful learning
Discovery Learning	Learner finds concepts independently	Less effective for complex knowledge

Ausubel maintained that well-organized instruction, even when delivered by the teacher, still demands mental activity from the learner.

4. Discovery: Critique and Controlled Use

A. Ausubel's View on Discovery Learning

He was a vocal critic of unguided discovery learning.

He believed that complex knowledge (like math, science) cannot be efficiently learned through self-discovery by children.

Discovery learning is often inefficient, time-consuming, and may lead to misconceptions.

However, he acknowledged that discovery has a role:

In early childhood learning

For enhancing curiosity and motivation

When guided or structured

B. Discovery as Mental Reconstruction

In Ausubel’s framework:

“Discovery” occurs internally, when a student sees how new knowledge fits with prior knowledge.

Discovery is not about finding facts but about realizing relationships.

C. Example

A teacher introduces the concept of photosynthesis through a detailed diagram and explanation, using prior concepts like sunlight, water, and plant growth.

The student discovers the pattern and connects it meaningfully in their mental framework.

That is Ausubel’s kind of discovery—a cognitive insight, not experimental.

5. Dialogue: Teacher-Learner Interaction

A. Role of Dialogue in Ausubel’s Theory

Although Ausubel emphasized verbal learning, he did not see students as passive listeners. He valued interaction and explanation in the form of:

Teacher-structured lectures

Advance organizers

Questioning and clarification

Verbal explanation by learners

B. Advance Organizers

One of Ausubel’s most famous contributions, Advance Organizers, are introductory materials presented before the learning task to help bridge new content with existing knowledge.

This is a form of structured dialogue between the teacher and learner:

Helps learners to orient their thinking.

Encourages internal dialogue in learners’ minds.

Stimulates active participation.

C. Dialogic Explanation

Teachers explain abstract ideas by relating them to learners’ everyday experiences.

Learners respond, question, and clarify.

This verbal interaction builds understanding.

D. Example

Before teaching the concept of democracy, a teacher discusses students' experience of school elections. This helps learners verbalize prior understanding, setting the stage for more abstract knowledge.

6. Subsumption Theory: The Mental Process of Knowing

A. Key Concepts

Subsumption is the process by which new material is linked to relevant existing ideas (subsumers) in the learner’s cognitive structure.

The new knowledge is assimilated, not added as isolated facts.

B. Types of Subsumption

Type	Description
Correlative Subsumption	New concept refines or extends existing knowledge
Derivative Subsumption	New concept is an example of a broader existing idea

C. Progressive Differentiation and Integrative Reconciliation

Progressive Differentiation: Teaching general concepts before details.

Integrative Reconciliation: Helping students integrate related concepts to avoid confusion.

These processes occur in the mind through structured mental activity, supported by verbal guidance from the teacher.

7. Comparison: Ausubel vs. Constructivist Approaches

Aspect	Ausubel	Constructivists (e.g., Piaget, Bruner)
View of Learning	Meaningful verbal learning	Active discovery learning
Role of Activity	Cognitive, mental	Physical, experiential
Role of Dialogue	Structured, teacher-led	Open, peer-led
Curriculum	Organized, sequenced	Flexible, exploratory
Efficiency	High for abstract knowledge	Less efficient

8. Classroom Implications

Teaching Element	Ausubel’s Suggestions
Curriculum Design	Organize content from general to specific
Teaching Method	Use advance organizers, structured explanations
Assessment	Focus on understanding, not memorization
Teacher's Role	Organizer and explainer of knowledge
Learner’s Role	Active cognitive participant, not a passive listener
Use of Dialogue	Encourage questioning, clarification, elaboration

9. Relevance of Ausubel Today

Ausubel’s theory is particularly useful for:

• Secondary and higher education
• Abstract and conceptual subjects (math, science)
• Lesson planning with clear objectives and structure
• Scaffolding learning through verbal cues and supports
• In the age of constructivism, his ideas provide a balance by reminding educators that clarity, structure, and connection to prior knowledge are essential for meaningful learning.

10. Conclusion

David Ausubel’s view of the process of knowing emphasizes the importance of structured learning, mental activity, and the anchoring of new knowledge in prior knowledge. While he did not prioritize hands-on activity or open-ended discovery, he advocated for active cognitive engagement through verbal instruction, advance organizers, and dialogue.

He made it clear that meaningful learning is not passive, but involves a thoughtful integration of new and existing knowledge—thus representing a deep internal process of activity, discovery, and dialogue.